57 Daniel Bodansky, Legal Options for U.S. Acceptance of a New Climate Agreement 14 (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, May 2015), on www.c2es.org/docUploads/legal-options-us-acceptance-new-climate-change-agreement.pdf. 40 Thus, the text circulated in the middle of last week had only about fifty brackets compared to the nine hundred brackets in the text sent by the ADP to ministers at the beginning of the week. You will find in the Paris Agreement a follow-up of the parentheses in successive draft negotiations. ORG in parisagreement.org (the last visit took place on 15.04.2016). 102 Faced with strong opposition from many states to the inclusion of a “commitment to be achieved”, the NDCs can, contrary to a proposal by Jorge Vinuales, The Paris Climate Agreement: An Initial Examination, Part II, EJIL: TALK! (February 8, 2016), on www.ejiltalk.org/the-paris-climate-agreement-an-ini-tial-examination-part-ii-of-iii/. 118 Id. Art. 4.3. The anticipation of “progress” seems stronger than the “non-retrograde” principle proposed by some during the negotiations, as it implies that the parties move forward and not merely withdraw. It can be satisfied by changes to the chain, scope or type of contribution.
54 Vienna Convention on Treaty Law, Art. 2, paragraph 1, under a), 23 May 1969, 1155 UNTS 331 (definition of the treaty as an “international convention between states in writing and by international law), . whatever its particular name”). 194 Tom Switzer, Paris Agreement Is a Triumph of Hope over Facts, Sydney Morning Herald (December 30, 2015), www.smh.com.au/comment/paris-climate-agreement-is-a-triumph-of-hope-over-facts-20151227-glvfd0.html. 188 Paris Pledge for Action, on www.parispledgeforaction.org/about/ (the last visit took place on March 15, 2016). 7 David Roberts, The Conceptual Breakthrough Behind the Paris Climate Treaty, VOX (December 15, 2015), www.vox.com/2015/12/15/10172238/paris-climate-treaty-conceptual-breakthrough. 92 Victor, David G. – Kennel, Charles F., Ditch the 2c Warming Goal, 514 Nature 30, 30-31 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Victor, David G., Why Paris Worked: A Different Approach to Climate Diplomacy, Environment 360 (Dec.
15, 2015), at e360.yale.edu/feature/why_paris_worked_a_different_approach_to_climate_diplomacy/2940/ Google Scholar (the 1.5 C target is “ridiculous”); Michael Le Page, Paris Deal Is Agreed-But Is It Really Good Enough?, New Scientist (December 12, 2015) at www.newscientist.com/article/dn28663-paris-climate-deal-is-agreed-but-is-it-really-good-enough/ (Quote by Michael Grubb, that “delivering 1.5 degrees C is simply incompatible with democracy”). 189 NAZCA stands for Nonstate Actor Zone for Climate Action. NAZCA: Accelerating Climate Action, at climateaction.unfccc.int (the last visit was on March 15, 2016). 76 U.S. Climate Action Network, Who`s on board with the Copenhagen Accord?, at www.usclimatenetwork.org/policy/copenhagen-accord-commitments (last visited Mar.
